There’s still time to register for and attend the joint Cheiron-Equine History Collective seminar this evening on the topic of Horse Training and Management in Ancient Egypt. Presenters are Lonneke Delpeut, Alberto Pollastrini, and myself. We’re looking forward to it – see you there! Check out the event’s Facebook page for more details.
https://www.facebook.com/events/368891569374953
Editing “Saints and Sinners on Horseback” has been a joy, and I’m thrilled to see that the print version of the volume is now available. Here’s a little taste of what’s in it. Find out more on the Trivent Publishing website, where you can also download the introduction free of charge: https://trivent-publishing.eu/home/156-239-saints-and-sinners-on-horseback-vol-1.html#/30-cover-ebook
The latest issue of our equine and equestrian history journal Cheiron is here! https://trivent-publishing.eu/home/176-cheiron-vol-3issue-2-2023.html
My coal and the Thoroughbred talk is now available on the Cheiron YouTube Channel.
In parts 1-3 we established that ponies have been on the island of Britain since – well, since it wasn’t actually an island, but still attached to the continent. They were, and are, fellow passengers through time. People have been living with them, making use of them, observing them, worshipping them, eating them (though not recently), and also getting bloody annoyed with them for centuries, if not millennia.
The latest lot of people to get bloody annoyed with ponies can frequently be found among some promoters of rewilding, who don’t seem to like any grazing animals at all, and no doubt think that the fact sheep and goats have horns prove that they are Satan’s spawn. I sometimes feel as though I’m living in a neo-Puritan age.
I find it increasingly hard to relate to anyone who will point out the mote in Mr or Ms Sheep’s eye but not see any beams in those belonging to circa eight billion delinquent car-driving, house-dwelling, phone-fiddling, plane-flying humans on the planet. Granted, sheep are not “indigenous” to Britain, but goats might be. Domesticated sheep arrived from West Asia (along with cereal growing, no doubt) in the late Neolithic. Then came the vegetables. I’m pretty sure the sheep would have nibbled their way here eventually if Britain had remained part of the continental mass. As it was they most likely arrived along with humans in – ahem! – small boats. The vegetables would never have made it without human assistance.
We also established in previous parts of the series that I like vegetables, but I am aware of their limitations and issues when it comes to land use. Also, that deliberately growing vegetables is an entirely human thing and not always to the benefit of fellow passengers on the planet (though ponies do like an organically-grown carrot or two, and are happy to provide lots of muck in which to grow them, and other vegetables).
It’s clear that right onto the cusp of the industrial age there were still plenty of semi-feral herds, the descendants of domesticated and wild horses, across Eurasia. And that some still exist right here on the island of Britain. As land was enclosed, and then drained and/or industrialised, the big open spaces in which the herds had roamed shrank and the ponies became confined to the less fertile uplands and areas of mixed heath and trees such as the New Forest. Ponies helped with all those processes of enclosure, land improvement, and industrialisation. In other words, they were recruited without contracts into projects that would eventually limit their own environment and choices.
Right into the early twentieth century Britain’s ponies were still seen as a useful resource, an intrinsic part of the environment, and just something that was, well, there. Always had been. Apart from the small and hardy Galloway horses of southwest Scotland, once very famous, which had been lost, or rather incorporated into other breeds in a major round of “improvement” in the late eighteenth century.
Then something happened, or rather a series of unfortunate (or fortunate, however you look at it) events occurred.
The most obvious one was the arrival of the car. Poop poop! I’ve always thought that the chapter in Wind in the Willows describing how a car forces off the road the canary-coloured horse-drawn caravan, in which our heroes Ratty, Mole, and Toad are talking a leisurely break, reflected a pivotal moment in reality as well as fiction. Toad becomes an instant car fanatic as he sits in the wake of the speeding vehicle murmuring “Poop poop!” and “Oh joy, oh bliss!”. He thinks with pleasure of all the “horrid canary-coloured” caravans he will in his turn force from the roads. Meanwhile, Ratty and Mole, like all good horsepeople, are concerned for the safety and welfare of the horse.
Another major change was the arrival of the concept of “breeds” of horse, a long historical process that I’m not going to discuss in great detail here as it would lead to there being approximately 97 parts to this series. However, this had major implications for equines as people began to define what a horse or pony breed was, what it should look like, how tall it should be, even what colour it should be, and what its history and purposes were. The major difference between the nineteenth century attempt to do this and that of earlier centuries was that now people were to have “breed standards” and “stud books”. Many of those stud books contained terms along the lines of “any solid colour, but not piebald or skewbald”.
Today, it’s quite normal to see piebald and skewbald Dartmoor ponies, and to hear them described as a significant part of Dartmoor’s heritage. However, this was certainly not the case sixty years ago, in the days of Jenny Loriston-Clarke’s famous Shilstone Rocks Stud of Dartmoor ponies, or even as recently as forty years ago. Here’s a quote on Dartmoor Ponies from the breed description in Jane Kidd’s edition of The New Observer’s Book of Horses and Ponies (1984):
“The ponies remain unhandled unless rounded-up for sale, and few mares and fewer stallions are ever handled except for breeding purposes.” Right, this is in line with the comments in my previous blog on Britain’s semi-feral herds, though we may wonder at why some mares and stallions need to be handled for “breeding purposes”. They can probably manage fine themselves, but that might lead to the “wrong kind of ponies”, which leads nicely into the next paragraph.
Kidd continues: “The continuing existence in its natural habitat of the pure Dartmoor has for many years been in serious jeopardy. In the early twentieth century, in order to meet the need for very small pit ponies, some moormen indiscriminately introduced Shetland stallions to the moors. The result was an indifferent and sometimes degenerate Dartmoor-Shetland cross, which multiplied at the cost of the true Dartmoor. However, the Dartmoor Pony Society has made strenuous efforts to eliminate this regression, introducing stringent upgrading registers. With the help of a few individual breeders, it has managed to safeguard the purity of the breed.”
And what is “the purity of the breed”? Among other parameters, “Not exceeding 12.2 hands. Bay, black, or brown preferred, but no colour bar except skewbalds and piebalds. Excessive white is discouraged.”
This is borne out by Caroline Silver’s near contemporary Horses of the World publication (1978): “Bay, black, and brown are preferred. Odd colours such as piebald and skewbald exist, but they are not recognised by the breed society”. She also refers to the “small, aristocratic heads” of the Dartmoors, small heads being something of an obsession for some “improvers”, especially those who like Lady Wentworth argued that the Arab(ian) horse was the great improver, with its most beautiful head (in her opinion).
In other words, the ponies that are now held to be valuable, and valued, for their own sakes, including piebald and skewbald ponies on Dartmoor, would forty years ago have had their pony epaulettes torn off and been drummed out of the Dartmoor Pony messroom. If you saw a pony with particular characteristics in the wilds of Dartmoor, it was a Dartmoor pony. And the piebalds and skewbalds, maybe with Shetland ancestry? We don’t talk about those.
I mean honestly. Those Shetlands coming down here with their “Hoots!” and “Jings!”, luring our precious mares to get up to no good with a “Ye’re a bonnie wee lassie and it’s a braw, bricht, moonlicht nicht the nicht”. Note that the people who actually kept and managed and needed the herds, the upland farmers and miners, weren’t at all bothered about that. It was the (now mainly middle class) upholders of ponies as heritage who were flustered by those randy little Shetlanders.
Caroline Silver also provides a quote from William Youatt, nineteenth century author of many texts on animal husbandry and breeds: “There is a breed of ponies much in request in that vicinity [Dartmoor], being sure-footed and hardy, and admirably calculated to scramble over the rough roads and dreary wilds of that mountainous district. The Dartmoor pony is larger than the Exmoor, and if possible, uglier. He exists there almost in a state of nature. The late Captain Colgrave, governor of the prison, had a great desire to possess one of them of somewhat superior figure than the others, and having several men to assist him, they separated it from the herd. They drove it on some rocks on the side of a tor. A man followed on horseback, while the captain stood below, watching the chase. The little animal, being driven into a corner, leaped completely over man and horse and escaped”.
“They’re good enough as they are.“ “They need improving!” “They need to be managed!” “They need to be left alone.” And so on. The debates continue to this day, with the horses in the middle of this tug-of-war, completely oblivious to what goes on in human psychology until the day arrives where it affects them without any shade of doubt via a shot from a helicopter, or the horse box that takes them to the meatman. Sadly, the major debate today regarding semi-feral equines, not just in Britain, appears to be between two new camps: “Do we need them at all?” and “They are our heritage”, which may in the end prove to be far more problematic than the conflict between breed improvers and standardisers, and pragmatists like the moormen. The latter thought nothing of changing their “heritage” with Shetland stallions in order to meet market needs. Perhaps horses would prefer it if we went back to the Boxgrove days, when they knew hominids were predators, and they were prey. At least it was clear where they stood.
While I was putting this blog together, something was happening. Gareth Wyn Jones, a Welsh (Cymric) farmer with a big social media profile (and a lot of followers, not all of whom are supporters) was bringing down a struggling foal from the mountains in the teeth of a howling storm, to try to save its life. That’s what he and his ancestors have been doing for centuries, and will carry on doing for as long as they can. Sadly the foal died despite his best effort to save it. I doubt if he met many of his critics up there on the mountains in the face of Storm Isha. You can watch his efforts to save it here:
Miriam A Bibby 2024
Having not set out to write a saga, I find myself doing so as we reach part 3, and we still haven’t yet encountered the modern semi-feral herds of ponies on the island of Britain. So far we’ve determined that small equines have been on this little bit of land called Britain for literally thousands of years, and I’m now ready to take the tale closer to modern times – but perhaps not right up to date. Not quite, not yet.
Now you did read parts 1 and 2 didn’t you? And you did watch the nail-biting journey of the Bakhtiari as they moved their flocks and herds (or the flocks and herds moved them) to fresh pastures. If you didn’t I suggest you go back and watch it. There’s no finer way to understand the connection between humans and non-human animals in the ancient migratory drifts, and how migration morphed into herding. Herding is closer to the natural migration of animals than any other human activity.
As you watch the Bakhtiari fastening their animals onto rafts, dragging them out of the river so they don’t drown, and urging, even lashing, the swimming animals on so they reach safety on the farther shore, something will become very clear. There are goats, sheep, horses, dogs, and cattle. You may have spotted other species. But no vegetables whatsoever. Absolutely no vegetables at all.
You won’t see herds of bright-eyed young leeks being chivvied on their way by Mother Leek, all anxious to reach the fertile beds of newly turned soil on the far side of the mountain. There are no tomatoes bouncing happily along (gawd, what a mess that would make – instant pesto, especially if the onions flattened them and the ensuing mush rolled over the migratory basil and slow-moving pine nuts). There’s no celery crunching up the snowy passes. No hopping pumpkins or ludicrously fertile courgettes spreading out in mighty bands as they roll towards the promised land. There’s no cereal, either. No golden barley weaving its way down to the waiting pastures, running its fingers through its glorious stalks, and whispering to anyone that will listen “One day Sting will write a song about me.” Readers who are familiar with the LoTR lampoon Bored of the Rings may see where the inspiration for that section came from.
The reason no vegetables were involved in the migration of the Bakhtiari is because agriculture is an unnatural and completely anthropocentric activity, unlike migratory drifts and herding. Period. Only humans cultivate, and most importantly, only humans cultivate monocrops. Even when those monocrops are used to raise cattle or other animals for meat (a criticism worked to the edge of exhaustion by non-meat-eaters, and one with which I largely agree) it’s still anthropocentric. It’s for the benefit of humans. People argue that the animals benefit too in terms of welfare, giving birth, and pure survival, and that’s not a point I’m going to argue with here. Rearing all vegetable, cereal, and fruit crops the way we do is ultimately anthropocentric, whether eaten by us or domestic animals, and it has severe implications for the state of the planet.
I’m speaking here as one who not only loves and eats lots of fruit and veg – five a day? Bloody hell mate, give me a proper challenge – but who also grows lots of vegetables. I was vegetarian for 12 years – I’m not any longer. There’s a kind of hypocrisy about kidding oneself about not wanting to eat certain animals because it’s cruel, but having to destroy other animals in order to get a vegetable crop.
Growing vegetables is a constant struggle against other animals who want to eat the vegetables. One copes, one way or another. But that coping inevitably involves the removal or exclusion in some way of those animals that want to eat the veg, otherwise, I’d probably end up with very few, possibly zero, vegetables. Or one can encourage one animal to eat the others, which never works as well as it sounds, in my opinion, because the birds would rather eat peanuts off the bird table than pick caterpillars off the cabbages, thank you very much.
So, is the removal or exclusion of other animals from eating human crops genuinely Vegan? The majority of commercial crop-growers don’t care about that – they spray, they dig up the ground, they cover it in plastic mesh or plastic sheeting. Some will shoot birds or animals attempting to steal “their” crops. After a cereal crop is harvested by a mighty combine, the canny corvids and seagulls fly in, ready to feast on the remains of chopped up rodents, insects, and amphibians. Plus, agriculture is an industry that is currently totally dependent on the agri-petro-chemical industry. Where there is agricultural land, there is inevitably loss of habitat for other species, in our intensively cultivated world.
You could be a fruitarian or a forager of course. That would mean denying other animals access to that particular mushroom or crab apple you’re just about to pick. You see, something suffers, and often dies, in order for you and I to live. That’s it. There’s no getting round it.
So where does that leave the ponies? For hundreds of years they were just out there, on the hills, in the bogs and swamps, a natural resource to be used by people. And used they were, for riding, for drawing vehicles, for pack animals, and probably when times were hard, eaten. There were nominally taboos on eating horse meat in Britain but I’m prepared to wager it happened at some point in the island’s long prehistory and history, and it certainly happened when herds were still crossing over Doggerland.
In the last few thousand years since there’s been herding and agriculture on this island, there have almost certainly been been annual drifts, as there are today – the connection with migration and herding is clear from the word drift – when herds of ponies would be brought down from the hills, or in from the fens, and some sold or exchanged, usually the foals from that or previous years. Henry VIII tried to control this ancient activity with legislation, namely “An Acte Concerning the breade of Horsys of England” but no-one took much notice of it. Bluster on, Hal. The upland farmers carried on doing what they’d always done, keeping an eye on the hill sheep, cattle, and ponies, and bringing the ponies down occasionally to horse sales. Horses in the fens were also brought to fairs. In parallel with this, there were breeding developments going on among the wealthy, and some of the feral and semi-feral stock contributed to these emerging horse breeds, some of which are still with us today.
And over time, thanks very much to the input from non-human animals in ways too numerous to list, the human population grew, and flourished mightily, with roads, railways, houses, and factories occupying more and more of the land. And the leeks and the turnips and the golden barley settled their roots deep into the fertile soil. And the humans looked out over cultivated ground and saw that it was good. And the ponies looked down from their last remaining places in the hills at the humans, and the houses, and the leeks, and roads, and wondered.
Miriam A Bibby 2024
Listen here to my History Rage rant about the importance of the Galloway Nag in Thoroughbred history. https://www.historyrage.com/episodes/episode/a1f661a1/breeding-out-thoroughbred-myths-with-dr-miriam-bibby
Managing. It’s such a human thing, isn’t it? Do any other animals in the world use the concept quite the way we do? Ants and bees have organisation, and so do flocks and herds. But managing … it tends to bring to mind corporate management, business handbooks and structure, people jostling for a place on the career ladder, and more of the same.
The semi-feral horses (ponies if you prefer – I’m sure they don’t care one way or the other) that live in herds in Britain that I discussed in an earlier blog are managed, often by people whose families have been involved in the care and management of the herds for centuries. I want to take a look at what that really means. However, before I do that, please, if you can, watch this documentary. It’s from 1925 and it charts the transhumance of one tribal group, the Bakhtiari, as they travel with their animals to their main summer grazing area. It’s not easy to watch, and you may find your twenty-first century sensibilities severely tested. The film is called “Grass: a Nation’s Battle for Life”. The main part covering the journey of the Bakhtiari begins at around 20 minutes 44 seconds, and you may prefer to watch from there. Then, if you are so inclined, jot down your thoughts after watching the film.
https://archive.org/details/xd-13934-grass-feature-version-mos-vwr
So here are my thoughts: This is one of the most gripping films I will ever watch. It’s terrifying and totally compelling in equal measure. Can’t bear it – can’t look away. People stripped half naked in freezing cold rivers trying desperately to steer their own way and their animals to safety. Carrying donkeys and calves on their backs. The animals are beasts of burden and so are the humans. Some of them are going to die and they know it. The sheer desperate need to make the journey. This is not so very far removed from the great migrations across Eurasia and Doggerland of hundreds of thousands of years ago. And this was happening just under a century ago. It’s not droving; it’s not herding, it’s not hunting, it’s a mass of animals and people on the move, all headed in the same direction – to the source of nourishment – grass. See how those sheep break into a happy run as they head downhill after the journey over the terrifying snowy mountain. They’re not running away – they could, but they know their best chance of survival is with the herds, and with the humans. Despite the anxiety, despite the rough handling, despite the fear and turmoil, they stick together. It’s epic. Even the names of the mountains are like something out of Lord of the Rings! And why are the humans doing this? Quite simply to get the herds and flocks to GRASS. Survival. Everyone’s survival, for all are interdependent.
When people talk about “the good shepherd” THIS is what they should have in mind. Not white Jesus in a clean robe, long hair neatly brushed and hands that never touched a carpenter’s tools. This is what they should visualise. Half naked people in freezing cold streams astride inflated goatskins, desperate to get their flocks and herds safely to the farther shore. These are the good shepherds. Managing.
So that’s “managing” the herds. A special, superhuman, interspecies type of management that makes our modern use of the term look laughably inadequate and even puerile. The people who manage the modern pony herds in Britain may or may not be the direct genetic descendants of the ancient herders (though some of them may be). The ponies may or may not be the direct genetic descendants of the equines who roamed across Doggerland half a million years ago (though some of them may be). They aren’t facing quite the same hazards as the ancient hominids of thousands of years ago, or even the Bakhtiari in the twentieth century. But they are still fulfilling a role with its roots deep in our human past.
More on the modern-day herds to follow.
Miriam A Bibby 01.12.23.
It’s been a while since I wrote a substantial blog for History on Horseback, and what’s inspired me to produce one now is the amount of commentary that’s going round on Britain’s native semi-feral herds of ponies. A lot of what I’m reading is not based on substantial knowledge of the herds, and some of it is not helpful at all.
To begin with some very deep history: if we go back to the days of half a million years ago, when Britain was still part of the Eurasian continent, just separated by the low-lying area that came to be known as Doggerland, hominids (upright apes like us) and animals made a seasonal migration to Britain in the northern hemisphere’s summer. In winter they retreated back to warmer climates in the south. It’s still a natural movement in various parts of the world, both of wild animals and domesticated animals being herded; and of course we witness it through the annual migrations of birds such as swallows, which are still able to make the journey, unlike animals, as the larger mammals would now have to do a cross-Channel swim to achieve it. Plus we’ve mostly destroyed their habitat and hunted many species to the point of extinction anyway.
But half a million years ago, that wasn’t an issue, and all kinds of animals made the annual migration, including horses, deer, and bison. Vast, and I mean VAST flowing herds of animals, followed by hominid hunters with stone tools, who slaughtered and ate them at locations such as what’s now Boxgrove on the south coast of England. There were so many equine bones discovered at one site it simply became known to the archaeologists who investigated it as the “Horse Butchery Site”. There was also a Rhino Butchery Site! Yes, really. There were mammoths too, and hyenas, all holidaying where Brits do now, saying the hyena equivalent of “turned out nice, couldn’t half fancy a bit of nice rump steak”. (You can read all about life in those days in Fairweather Eden by Michael Pitts and Mark Roberts. Worth getting hold of a copy if only for the superb reconstruction of rhino butchery in image 1, as well as the excellent graph showing just how often we’ve dipped and swung into Ice Ages and periods between.)
And that would have carried on season after season, with intermittent glacial periods when northern holidaying with the travelling buffet-on-legs wasn’t possible (sometimes the hominids were the buffet, if they encountered bears or big cats), if it hadn’t been for two things.
The first thing was that at least one Major Geological Incident called the Storegga Slide, around 8,500 years ago, caused an inundation that left Doggerland permanently under water. Or perhaps it was simply naturally rising sea levels at the end of the Ice Age. Evidence of previous occupation by humans and animals still lies there, just a few feet below the surface of the North Sea in places. No more crossing Doggerland to take a break in the summer, munch on the lush grass and browse on the trees of what’s now the island of Britain, or eat the grazers of grass and browsers of trees and bushes. Hominids and non-hominid animals stood on the further shore, much like passengers awaiting their delayed flight at Heathrow, except this flight was never going to arrive.
The second thing was that hominids, no longer happy to stick with outdated stone tools (still using that old thing? OK, Boomer) decided that they could do even better than partake of nature’s buffet, and set off down the road marked progress, ultimately taking some of the animals along with them as “domesticated species”. The hominids were also cunningly using their brains to develop new ways to cross the Channel, looking speculatively at the birds winging their way to the shore that now seemed forbidden to the hominids.
This is where the story of “Britain’s ponies” really begins, with the separation of part of continental Europe that would subsequently by historical accident or incident come to be known as “Britain”.
The story begins, as many good stories do, with a clash of beliefs. At its core is this question: did some small equines, ponies as we would now know them, survive the last glacial period and subsequent geological upheaval, to become the oldest equines on Britain? Did their ancestors live on the island before the last glacial episode? The principal candidates for this theory have long been the Exmoor ponies, with their distinctive coat colours and phenotype, and what are known as mealy-coloured muzzles and eyes, sometimes called toad eyes. Researchers have drawn comparisons with the horses in palaeolithic imagery.
Can coat colour, and particularly genes related to dun colouring assist in identifying the antiquity of equines? Researchers have attempted to discover the genetic factors related to the coats typical of Exmoors and other apparently similar types. In 2010, for instance, Michael Cieslak, Monika Reißmann, and Arne Ludwig explored aspects of this in an academic paper titled “Examination of melanophilin as a candidate gene for the equine dun phenotype”, noting that “The dun coloration is probably the wild phenotype in horses depending on its occurrence in Przewalski horses as well as in some primitive horse breeds (e.g. Exmoor Pony, Konik, Icelandic Horses, Norwegian Fjords, Sorraia)”. They concluded that “Although the melanophilin gene is responsible for dilution phenotypes in human, mice, and other domesticated species, the detected SNPs of this investigation revealed no facts showing that there is any obvious association with the dun phenotype”. And so on.
At that time, the Przewalski horses (also known as Takhis) were believed to be the only truly wild horses left in the world. Then, in 2019 a large group of researchers made an earth-shattering claim based on further DNA investigations: the Przewalski Horses were not wild at all, but the descendants of an early “domestication event” (known as DOM1) which had begun and then ceased. (Fages, Orlando, Outram et al, “Tracking Five Millennia of Horse Management with Extensive Ancient Genome Time Series”.) Where does that leave attempts to claim antiquity based on phenotype, colouring, and mealy muzzles? Good question. Where, indeed.
With the horses that had previously been believed to be the only truly wild ones in the world exposed as actually being the feral descendants of the first domestication event (this conclusion is contested in some quarters), that meant that all the horses in the world, apart from the Takhis, were in fact the domesticated or feral descendants of the later, second domestication event (DOM2), including our island ponies. Currently we still have no firm data that would enable us to comment on the antiquity of the Exmoor with complete confidence. They are, however, popular for conservation grazing schemes.
At this point it should be pointed out that “wild” horses continued to live in the landscape of Eurasia after horses were domesticated on the Eurasian steppe lands ca. 2500 BCE. And so the domesticated horses continued to breed with what were originally “wild” horses. The wild, or increasingly semi-feral herds consisting of a mix of domesticated and wild horse genes continued to proliferate in the landscape right into modern times, and their descendants still exist today on the island of Britain. They have done so since the introduction of the domesticated horse into Britain at some point possibly as early as the third millennium BCE.
What is a semi-feral herd? Semi-feral herds are those that mostly live a “natural” life (ie, with free access to grazing, natural mating and rearing of foals, and so on) but are periodically attended to by humans, usually in the form of drifts or “round-ups”. During these, the small horses (there’s a whole narrative to the word “pony”, but I’m not doing that today) are brought in, checked, given veterinary treatment if they need it, and some are sold. There may be substantial management by humans, especially regarding which stallions have access to which mares.
This system of equine management has been going on for centuries, if not millennia, across Eurasia. They were once simply everywhere in the landscape, these semi-feral herds. Our knowledge is hampered as to how long this has been going on in Britain by a lack of documentary evidence relating to the herds prior to medieval times. However, there’s decent evidence from later medieval times, of which I cite just a few examples:
The semi-feral herds that remain on the island today, on Dartmoor, Exmoor, in the hills of Wales and the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, as well as the Cumbrian Fells, and New Forest, are but a tiny remnant of the herds that once roamed here, from at least half a million years ago until early modern times. They are now under threat because we want the land for other purposes, pure and simple. They eat the grass! Disgusting! Put up a solar array instead. (Unless the ponies are some of the lucky ones that have been recruited for conservation grazing schemes.)
Here’s a picture of a hillside covered in solar panels, and another hillside with ponies on it. I know which I prefer, and I know which I think is more environmentally sound.
Conclusion: small equines (of the type that we now call ponies) have existed on the bit of land now known as Britain even longer than you and I, as modern humans, have. They have as much right as you or I to be here, if not more. Although most modern semi-feral herds have been very much influenced by decisions made by human breeders, some of the genes in those semi-feral herds may be of great antiquity. So here’s the question: does it really matter how old those genes are? Does it?
I’m going to do a part 2 that will look at the progress of some of Britain’s semi-feral pony herds over the last century or so, as they stopped simply being semi-feral herds and became “breeds”.
Miriam A Bibby 21.11.23.
historyonhorseback 